Divide to conquer?

Or back fire*?

This is a geometrical analysis of the partisan nature of politics.  We are familiar with the terms Fiscal and Social Conservative. But then there is the un-like Ike wing** and the Atlas Shrugged foundation or ^ fountain.  Here I may have already divided, to fight on.  I will try to keep the links and notations down. 

From what was earlier work on The Third Way, akin to the moving the center off the absolute, the moderate left seems to be moving the country.(See 1st link).  But is more than about geometrics of the left and the right and there being a middle.  If conservatives have branches(BTW the gov meant has three^^^); the FC and the SC (owe the irony oar^^), is there a third or more? 

A "friend" is counting on either a Tea Party, Conservative or Republican landslide this year.  But I am concerned with how branches work and how if there were already two, how Godwin[!] might play[?] Which is a sarcasm[!]slash[?]tangent on the hazzards of branching.

* not to target
** un-like Ike (USC)
Tin Foil Herman
R.S.V.P.
Mmmm MOW, MOW

^ oar shrug heads?(sc)
^^ paddle Fiscal Cliff and (YOU)Scroll Click or NEO-CONservative bent

[!] punctuation mark for irony/sarcasm/rhetorical***

*** anachronistic inserts [Francis Fukuyama was in the crowd that plowed the field and half regrets it.]
^^^ 3-body fig Newtons.or Phig Physics

BTW: USC is one of my alma maters.  UW the other.  But here I play on the initialism of "You Scroll Click" and Al Gore Rhythms and anomalies of the (b.s.) blog search[!]   

Final Note: Under wiki of Divide And Conquer ? [!] (or pyth helmet ?)

Go Hawks !

Bio ~ engineering.

My first major was Chemical Engineering at USC before a stint in their East Asian Languages and Cultures Department.*  After a sabbatical for a number of years, the result was a BA in Liberal Studies at the University of Washington.

[anachronistic writing]**
*removing the impression that I am at all responsible for the hyperlink
** the following are notes in progress akin to side notes on a page being read

NOTES:
Madhyamaka     /     Dialetheist       crazy ~  unmattaka
M-theory of D {?}
Paraconsistent Logic
Paradox ~ ironic ~ rhetorical device
Conceptualization ~/~ falsifies

Nietzsche: tT~ER (eternal recurrence)
Radical Contextualist Semantics ~requires meaning
Statement ~\~ truthmaker (not required)

=====================   segue   ==========
W-Theory  ~ Milo Wolff
Logical Positivism   Fusion v. Confluence
Defluence is the struggle[!]
=====================   theory?==========
LEVEL TWO NOTES:
W for Wolff AND Wave
Not to mention paradox of M.
Model / Madhyamaka / meaning?
D for Dialetheist, Dimensions and Design
Even rougher notes:
Paraconsistent Wittgenstein
Popper's poker.
=============
Then there is Methane[!]
Big T, and small t: Truth and Tetrahedron
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

* asterisk info only added 5-2-16
Pardon my style.

FOOTNOTES PAGE DECEMBER 2013

Begun 12-3-13

12-1-13:(sc) math problem un4m~ulated. (NFRY)
12-2-13(cont.) Too Random... Righty? 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 (the point ?)
[4 the record : 3 squared? ]
12-3-13: Parallel [!] un-Pink Floyd, He- /^\ , van-NO JOKE, ven-Rough Philosophy, Cry- / Star Chamber Revisited, river- / creek ? 

rtd 12-3-13

Retrieved from draft 12-13-13
State Theory <- heading // lede -> and duality // trinity/body  Headings and^ Leadership*. (dynamics)
  ^    of/or 8:  Snooze/Dream(4,6) *prof(it)C? (7,8) Bane or Right?  [Not to blog both ends against the middle.]
Don’t celebrate yet!: Why Boehner won’t really ditch the right-wing nutjobs. /  The Christian right wants civilization to collapse / (3/5) Head ~ Lead Paul Krugman: The GOP’s austerity agenda is winning / My critics have “income envy”: Ed Schultz unloads after backlash to his union quote 
Dual / nd: When will the media learn? Conservatives are not “centrists”! / 3 essential (and ignored) questions about Detroit’s bankruptcy  Try Ad of Caution?  (not fully read yet) (anachronistic construction) (duel conflation)~ (bc: bubble critics)  OW Hegel ~ Liebniz [!]
RTD


12-23-13 (4) A.  Rubric's Cube and Rhetorical Realmifications., B. What's good for the goose? Goose the gander! c. Snooze Alarm d. Tony Baloney e. WWW Wisconsin Lesson? f. We Need Ed  g, What's good for the goose...

12-27-13 
12-28-13 1 Was Wittgenstein Right? or behind [?^] 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 ... 9  // 10 / 11
^ insert a - h
12-29-13 - Original 5 links.  A. Frank O File? B. Pi cAP Delta rOW(USC) C. 1. Inverse Reality?,  2.(i), 3. Fair and Balanced..., D. Wittgenstein , E. Re-Mix  ///
12-30  F.rough- 1. Punderous Ponderings , 2. State of Politics , 3. A Revolution? 4.Un-Exceptionalism 5.  , G.notes^ -1. 2.Heuristic Concurrence and  3.My Respects to Those who Celebrate. (re-search*) , H.math^^ - 1. Too Random... , 2., 3.Bury the lede?, 4. ROW MAN #Sign [Numeral (i)] . *(under the case of not fully read yet, but back to math... why now 16?  too cubed by two? Speculation that the 5th perspective is from apart too pun? The three-body problem regards intitial circumstances from within or without. R 1st 3 models different than recently added.  The pow#r of i(V)?

Speculative Intelligence

Spoiler alert: I have no access to other than open sources.
I have been very skeptical of Edward Snowden's behavior.*

The following is only speculative. 
BTW: What is the opposite of B.S.? ... S B (Steve Benen)
How to put it very carefully?  The separation of powers is one thing, but intelligence is not just for the executive branch.  The issue coming to logger heads, may show that Edward Snowden had no alternative, when oversight is such as it has become**.  It is hard to believe his actions merit rebuke, if congress's oversight is an oversite[!]  

*Note: (b.s.) =blog searches @2,3&5 / un-Mbeds @1,4&6+(5f)
** or always has been

Tacktick[!] (s.c.) = USC: one of my alma maters & (You Sroll or Click.)
[!]=sarcasm/pun although oversight may be justifiably a pun itself.
Alt B.S. = balanced solutions, Bowles Simpson (see"*"4m@)
[tan gent: to reads]

Time Stanp AM 3-13-14

Egg/Road/Sky*

or crossing the chicken...^

 

The Tikkun(MayJune'09)

knot Rubicon.

* a triad
^ a try ad ?


W. (a)Pre-post-or-us? , (b)  "OFF A CLIFF" , (c) Humpty Dumpty... , (d) Tear Down That Wall! , (e.)High8US , (f)  Bottom Line? , (g)  Revolutionary Hospitals (and Back Again) , (h) On the wall verses on the table. , (i) On the wall verses on the table. (j)Humpty Dumpty (k) Hold your head up Paul Krugman!  (l) A Plea to Congress  (m) Between the charges   [USC:dumpty]
X. (a) Humpty Dumpty... , (b) "they trust themselves" , (c)  The Clash  (d)  The Most Dangerous Game ,
=====
Y. (i) Odyssey Dawn , (ii)  Crossing the Rubicon (iii) CON TEXT / CON SCIENCE ABOUT THE PROCESS!
Z.  Rubric's Cube and Rhetorical Realmifications.

BTW: I wonder Y the only link that is not a~ (sc)anomaly is (iii)?  Not because I let YouSC. Not to mention the spin on W(m) 
Snap! Big JC on Ed! (*^.)**

** [New Page](.) [Carpe Diem!](d/e) [D or R][Mixed News: colors and letters]  / PC of Mini-Me ?
{note to test that anomaly of (b.s.)/(sc)}   

Republicans can't run against congress anymore.

Wanna bet ? 
That's sarcasm, not a wager.
It will have to be a do something congress. 

(FN?) not ready to footnote:
1.  Republicans Gain Four Governorships, Bucking Anti-Incumbency Fever
2.  A. The Jig is Up?, B. The Real B. S. of the F. C.
3.  Former Republican senator sees potential doom in Cantor loss
4. Bad News, Good News. (~)Trick Question of the Day?, (~)Inconvenient, What President Obama should say tomorrow., Debate: Take One  
(~)  QCON: TruthOut, Trick Question of the Day?, FORGOTTEN HUMANITY! (A, B, C)
(^)  Tea Party Down Grade, Bleep 'n Compromise (Dept Ceiling) Review**, Hoof and Mouth. (A, B, C)

(~) (usc)~ you scroll click re:anomaly

[AM Rep Cong leader makes good points about Harry Reid, but ignores original obstructionists and power of purse*.  Rance Priebus and top down selection.] 
Ron an Daily Obama and the leaders.
[RFD, RFD2 , ]
* posted pre-Mitch McConnell address.
[Washington Post: Obama Transcript]


11-6-14
Divide to concur[!]
Yeah, that's the gay divorce[!] aka ticket ala Nietzsche.  No more kickin' the "kickin' the can game" down the road.  What doesn't kill ya may make you vote.
AKA States Right, People Left
[Manchin]
{RM, RM2, RM3,}
Point counterpoint?

 

Green Bay / New York

Just for the fun of it, these are my picks.
No brilliant insight, only hunches based on interests.
For Green Bay it is fan ownership.
For New York it is the USC quarterback.
But what really matters? Finding meaning in things.
Then change.

What is the link here? The final two links regard a Sense of Events, by Donald Sensing. Quality satire(above) and comment.

Well... it is ironic that I have possibly been too fair and balanced in my view of the latter selectin of his. But his comment on the former may be the key:Stephen Hawking’s philosophy is so deficient that you have to wonder whether his science is, too. It would seem that only the reverse could be try*, but even that is ironic.

[This post pulled from draft at this The best laid plans... time.]
[*not exactly tried but...true, evidence of draft nature]

Revamp Devenn?

Power Broker Mountain Project
Power Broker Mentor Project***


Psychology
Philosophy
Physics
Politics


Under Construction
Obamanomics


Politics,
Philosophy


Pre-Post-Or-Us: UC
Table Irony ? !


NOW Confidence?
The Cycle? Paul Harvey/Stringonomer
The irony of the caricature.






***[Technical difficulties have put draft at risk of going AWALL.]


While the first...
a revamp or...
Ironically I had...
*(dual asterisks...)
{L} USC (scroll click)...
**background...
Lost in Draft(FP?) Loss confirmed.


REBOOT?

Footnotes Page December 2014 Page Two

12-2-14: (usc) lede or ship >< (regards to scroll/clicks and headings) Sea Labels. (oW) on Will?
(b.s.)reducks(bp) >: A. "no such thing as bad press", B. (FP2@), C. A Fifth, D. Short Cuts, E. Mass Characterization, F. hmmm?, (/) G. Just: a thought., H. Memories...or Excusing Pre-quashing , I. Anachronistic Reasoning? , J. Caging Godzillas , K. QCON: TruthOut , L. Belated Calls and Commemoration? , M. Global Communications, N. HIT AND RUN (QCON)

(/) Running/Drafting Footnotes  (/) (The Reid Report /The Cycle) Holder Cook! Shumer/Howard-16oo. Webb-Huntsman[!] Warren-Carter?

12-4-14: 1. 2. 3. on* Words. (OW) *on/of/or The Inconvenience of Both/And.
12-5-14: (Breaking) TGIF (RFD?)/ Raven System. (uc) / [~week~] Ir(e)ony [?] ofor words[!]
12-8-14 ; fed-upism? Re:fed-upism [!]